Five foundations. Fifteen markers. A traffic light per foundation. A decision rule that treats amber and red as blocking, not directional. Ten minutes to run. One board conversation you cannot fake through.
Growth-stage SaaS CEOs answer "are we ready to scale?" from feel. Bookings are up. Pipeline looks healthier than it did in Q1. The team is motivated. The CEO says yes. Nine months later the sales team has doubled, the new geography has opened, the partner programme has launched, and two of those three moves have quietly stalled.
The pattern is not a strategy problem. Every one of those moves was strategically sound. The pattern is that scale-readiness was measured as a forward motion. It is a state. States get evaluated as states.
This paper defines the state. Five foundations. Fifteen markers, three per foundation. A traffic light per foundation. A decision rule at the end. If any single foundation scores amber, the honest answer to "can we scale?" is not yet. If any single foundation scores red, the answer is fix that first, and stop pretending the others matter.
Chairs and board members of growth-stage B2B SaaS businesses between roughly £10M and £100M ARR. Private equity operating partners assessing a portfolio company's scale-readiness before signing off the next move. CEOs who suspect the yes on the last board deck was a yes-from-feel and want a way to run the honest audit before the next one.
Four exits over three decades (Lotus to IBM, Paragon to Phone.com, Apertio to Nokia $240M, Clearswift to Lyceum) plus COO and CGO seats at Lumeon and Sapio Sciences. Every foundation is drawn from a scale move that either worked or stalled for a reason the diagnostic would have surfaced.